Looking beyond the veil of the European crisis--the need to uncover the structural causes of health inequalities.

نویسندگان

  • Antonio Escolar Pujolar
  • Amaia Bacigalupe
  • Miguel San Sebastian
چکیده

We are happy to announce the second cluster of papers around the economic crisis and its impact on health in Europe in our journal, the International Journal for Equity in Health. Nine empirical articles and two commentaries are included in this volume. This important amount of research points to the relevance of continuing to monitor the health impacts of the economic crisis in the European region. While certain macroeconomic recovery has been observed in the last couple of years, the economic situation remains unstable, particularly for the Mediterranean countries which still face numerous economic challenges. High unemployment rates, temporary contracts, low salaries and diminished social benefits, among others, are current social determinants which will continue deteriorating the health of the European population [1]. After our first editorial two years ago [2], we have witnessed how the European region has moved from the crisis situation and settled into a period of stagnation. Aiming to overcome the crisis under a neoliberal development model, most of the governments across the region implemented austerity policies based on regressive tax structures and deep spending cuts, particularly to public services such as education, health and social security. These policies may prove to be shortsighted and only contribute to the erosion of mechanisms that reduce inequality and enable equitable growth [3]. As the economist Paul Krugman recently wrote in the Guardian “Since the global turn to austerity in 2010, every country that introduced significant austerity has seen its economy suffer, with the depth of the suffering closely related to the harshness of the austerity” [4]. Now, leading proponents of austerity, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), are beginning to recognize that these harsh measures have not led to the expected results, and have harmed both growth and equality [5]. Will this mean a change in European policies in the near future? To complicate the scenario, the next coming years are going to be marked by new and old realities, making the political context of the economic crisis potentially more complex and prolonged: i) European nations are still suffering record levels of long-term and youth unemployment, with a generation of young people facing years of joblessness to come, and many countries, particularly those in Southern Europe experiencing tremendous brain drain [6, 7]; ii) More than one million migrants fleeing from war zones (mainly Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan) have entered the European Union (EU). This will have economic implications for the European economy [8], in addition to the potential risks of growing xenophobia and violence against migrants; iii) The acts of terrorism in France in 2015 might lead to a loss of individual liberties on behalf of higher security, creating new elements of social stress; iv) The current Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) trade negotiations between the EU and United States has already raised several concerns regarding serious threat to national governments’ right to regulate, and protect public health services, consumer rights, the rights of workers or the to keep policies safeguarding the environment [9, 10]; v) Finally, the World Health Organization considers climate change as the greatest threat to global health in the 21st century [11]. The Paris agreement signed on 12 December 2015 commits signatories ́ countries to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius [12]. Though positive, a word of caution regarding its achievement is necessary given the current economic development model that promotes CO emissions. How will these events impact * Correspondence: [email protected] Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Is It More Important to Address the Issue of Patient Mobility or to Guarantee Universal Health Coverage in Europe?; Comment on “Regional Incentives and Patient Cross-Border Mobility: Evidence From the Italian Experience”

This paper discusses whether European institutions should devote so much attention and funding to cross-border healthcare or they should instead prioritise guaranteeing universal health coverage (UHC), inequalities and tackling the effects of austerity measures. The paper argues through providing the evidence in both areas of research, that the priority at European level from a public health an...

متن کامل

COVID-19 and Power in Global Health

Political scientists bring important tools to the analysis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, particularly a focus on the crucial role of power in global health politics. We delineate different kinds of power at play during the COVID-19 crisis, showing how a dearth of compulsory, institutional, and epistemic power undermined global cooperation and fuel...

متن کامل

Demography and the Coronavirus Pandemic

Abstract. One of the most urgent policy issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe concerns the extent and ways in which demographics have determined different patterns of mortality between groups and regions, and whether and how the pandemic and its economic consequences will affect population dynamics in the future. Post-pandemic policy evaluations on the spread of COVID-19 and the im...

متن کامل

Forced Migration and Global Responsibility for Health; Comment on “Defining and Acting on Global Health: The Case of Japan and the Refugee Crisis”

Forced migration has become a world-wide phenomenon in the past century, affecting increasing numbers of countries and people. It entails important challenges from a global health perspective. Leppold et al have critically discussed the Japanese interpretation of global responsibility for health in the context of forced migration. This commentary complements their analysis by outlining three pr...

متن کامل

Reaching Outside the Comfort Zone: Realising the FCTC’s Potential for Public Health Governance and Regulation in the European Union; Comment on “The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments – What It Brings to Global Health Governance?”

In their paper, Nikogosian and Kickbusch show how the effects of the adoption by the World Health Organization (WHO) of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) and its first Protocol extend beyond tobacco control and contribute to public health governance more broadly, by revealing new processes, institutions and instruments. While there are certainly good reasons to be optimisti...

متن کامل

Calls for Stricter Legislation and Fear in the European Immigrant Community: Reflections of the Public Charge Debate Ongoing in the United States; Comment on “A Crisis of Humanitarianism: Refugees at the Gates of Europe”

In the editorial, “A Crisis of Humanitarianism: Refugees at the Gates of Europe,” Marianna Fotaki elegantly highlights the changing dynamics of governmental policy toward refugees, forced migrants into Europe and the move away from the principles of humanitarianism.1 The perceived threats to economy, securi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • International journal for equity in health

دوره 15  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016